Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Christopher Lull, et al v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 20-16599
Defendant / Appellee:
CYNDI LEE, JUNE POWELLS-MAYS, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO REVENUE RECOVERY DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUTOTEK, INC. and CHRISTOPHER LULL
(PS) Lull v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2020cv01645
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Robert Logsdon, Ben Green and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Planning Department, County of Sacramento Building Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lull et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2016at00605
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, County of Sacramento Planning Department, County of Sacramento Building Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eastman v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
as INN/3:15-cv-00585
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Eastman
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Eastman v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00585
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Eastman
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eastman v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01056
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Eastman
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet, Inc., Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Justin Eastman v. Michelle Smith
as 15-2226
Petitioner - Appellant:
Justin Wayne Eastman
Respondent - Appellee:
Michelle Smith, Warden
Eastman v. Smith
as 0:2014cv04795
Petitioner:
Justin Wayne Eastman
Respondent:
Michelle Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
