Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gary Hicks v. Charles Ryan
as 13-71158
Petitioner: GARY WAYNE HICKS
Respondent: CHARLES L. RYAN
Hicks #190943 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00327
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Gary Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hicks v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv00063
Plaintiff: Shawn Wayne Hicks
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Gary Hicks v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 09-17867
Petitioner - Appellant: GARY WAYNE HICKS, AKA Gary Hicks
Respondent - Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN and STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hicks v. Schriro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00328
Petitioner: Gary Wayne Hicks
Respondent: Dora Schriro and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phillipson v. Myicis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02412
Plaintiff: Anthony Phillipson
Defendant: Myicis and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sophia et al v. Myicis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv02364
Plaintiff: Christina Sophia and William Florian
Defendant: Myicis and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Simons v. Myicis et al
as 2:2007cv00413
Plaintiff: Raymond J Simons
Defendant: Myicis, Wayne Hicks, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pollock v. MYICIS et al
as 3:2007cv00304
Plaintiff: Seth Pollock
Defendant: MYICIS and Wayne Hicks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tabb v. MYICIS et al
as 3:2007cv00302
Plaintiff: Roger L Tabb
Defendant: MYICIS, Wayne Hicks and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?