Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Amia Bryant v. Darrell Steinburg, et al
as 23-15287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMIA L. BRYANT
Defendant / Appellee:
DARRELL STEINBURG, Mayor, MARY LYNNE VELLINGA, Chief of Staff, ALLEN WAYNE WARREN, City Councilman, District 2 and others
(PS) Bryant v. Steinburg et al
as 2:2022cv01308
Plaintiff:
Amia L. Bryant
Defendant:
Darrell Steinburg, Mary Lynne Vellinga, Allen Wayne Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Collier
as 3:2021cv00787
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Collier
as 3:2021cv00788
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Mackey et al
as 3:2020cv03703
Defendant:
G Jackson, K Farmer and Wesley Mackey
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Warren v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02926
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Incorporated, Does 1 -10, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willam Ellis, Sr. v. Wayne Warren, et al
as 20-10722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLAM ELLIS, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE WARREN, EBI LLC, MEDTRONIC, INC. and others
Roger Carter, et al v. Arkema, Inc., et al
as 19-5820
Defendant / Appellant:
ARKEMA, INC. and ARKEMA INC. RETIREMENT BENEFITS PLAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RICKY LYNN WOODS, and a class of others similarly situated, EDDIE DEAN HEWITT, and a class of others similarly situated, DAVID WAYNE WARREN, and a class of others similarly situated and others
ELLIS vs. WARREN
as 4:2019cv00067
Defendant:
Dr Wayne Warren
Plaintiff:
Reverand WILLIAM L ELLIS, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Warren v. Alabama Department of Mental Health et al
as 7:2016cv01666
Plaintiff:
Wayne Warren
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Mental Health and Perry Walker, the estate of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
