Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McInnis v. Stanley et al
as 1:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Damien D. McInnis
Defendant:
Ashley N. Stanley, Weeden Wetmore and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrig v. Brennan et al
as 1:2021cv01181
Plaintiff:
Dion Derrig
Defendant:
John Brennan, Mary Gantert and Weeden Wetmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tapp v. I.G.R.C. John Doe et al
as 6:2020cv07072
Defendant:
C.O. John Doe, Head Nurse Administrator 7-3, I.G.R.C. John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Sean E. Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driscoll v. Chemung County
as 19-1466
Defendant / Appellee:
Susan Rider-Ulacco, Police Officer Andrew Hughson, Chemung County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Driscoll v. Chemung County
as 18-2361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant - Appellee:
Chemung County, Ryan Card, Sheriff Christopher Moss and others
Driscoll v. Chemung County et al
as 6:2017cv06752
Plaintiff:
Ramonn S. Driscoll
Defendant:
Chemung County, Ryan Card, Christopher Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillory v. Washburn et al
as 1:2014cv00484
Plaintiff:
Patrick Guillory
Defendant:
Kathleen Washburn, Belena Krusen, Tim Hourihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Griffin
as 14-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
Steven M. Cohen, Assistant United States Attorney, Jonathan D. Schwartz, Assistant United States Attorney, Debra A. Martin, Assistant Attorney General In Charge and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Patrick Griffin, Superintendent, William Hopkins, Deputy Superintendent of Administration, Angela Bartlett, Deputy Superintendent of Program and others
Ritchie v. Bradt et al
as 1:2008cv00259
Plaintiff:
Seth Ritchie
Defendant:
Mark Bradt, William Hopkins, Steven Wenderlich and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
