Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Daniel Loughran, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al
as 19-3530
Defendant / Appellee:
MCCALLA, RAYMER, LIEBERT, PIERCE, LLC, WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., doing business as WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARGARET LOUGHRAN and DANIEL LOUGHRAN
Loughran et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv04023
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Mayer Brown LLP, Pierce & Associates P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Loughran and Margaret Loughran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS v. BANC OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01463
Defendant:
ALLY FINANCIAL, BANC OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jaffe v. Household Intl Inc, et al
as 1:2002cv05893
Plaintiff:
Glickenhaus Institutional Group, Lawrence E Jaffe and Glickenhaus Inst Grp
Special Master:
Phillip S. Stenger
Defendant:
Household International Inc., Arthur Andersen, L.L.P., W F Aldinger and others
Respondent:
Carl A. LaSusa and Wells Fargo & Company
Petitioner:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc, State of Vermont and Kevin McDonald
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
