Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 269
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024mc00090
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant: Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
USA v. Approx. $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account et al
as 2:2024at00217
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $1,697,930.94 seized from River City Bank Account and Approximately $230,000.00 seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account
Claimant: Daniel Stewart and Luke Burroughs
United States of America v. $372583.77 in seized funds from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv00102
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $372,583.77 in seized funds from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and $372583.77 in seized funds from Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. Approx. $140,774.48 seized from Wells Fargo Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01989
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $140,774.48 seized from Wells Fargo Bank account number 5934091793 and Approximately $11,700.31 seized from Wells Fargo Bank account number 6563035143
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $1,883,673.51 in U.S. Currency et al
as 1:2023cv00207
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $1,883,673.51 in U.S. Currency, 946 Caroline Drive, Biloxi, MS, All Funds in Legend Trading Currency Account # 1503983881 and others
Interested Party: Robert Leon Deming, III
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737
as 3:2023cv00555
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In Re: 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, 14019 Emma Way Cove Drive, Gonzales, Louisiana 70737, $61,576.99 from Navy Federal Credit Union Account Number XXXXXX8007 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
USA v. Approx. $70,000.00 seized from Chase Bank account number 9343714245 et al
as 2:2023mc00301
Plaintiff: United States and United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $70,000.00 seized from Chase Bank account number 9343714245, Approximately $38,582.49 seized from TD Ameritrade account number 756-362930, Approximately $3,061.65 seized from Wells Fargo Bank account number 6214166578 and others
United States of America v $473,519.11 In United States Currency Formerly On Deposit In Wells Fargo Bank Account Ending In -1102 Held In The Name Of Sheyen Construct Inc. Seized On Or About May 9, 2022 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04217
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $473,519.11 In United States Currency Formerly On Deposit In Wells Fargo Bank Account Ending In -1102 Held In The Name Of Sheyen Construct Inc. Seized On Or About May 9, 2022
Claimant: OM Select LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
United States of America v. 762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. 8773 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01829
Defendant: $961,136.43 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '0383, $397,883.73 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account No. '1199, $762,201.48 Seized From U.S. Bank Account No. '8773 and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant: Khaled J. Al-Sabah
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
USA v. Approximately $340,294.27 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00399
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $340,294.27 Seized From Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 2508100126
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?