Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Gossett v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gossett and Kimberly D. Gossett
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2002-5, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-5, PHH Mortgage Corporation, NewRez LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association fka Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association) as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage v. Sanchez Casler et al
as 3:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association fka Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association) as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgage and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Successor by Merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association fka Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association as Trustee for Merrill Lynch Mortgag
Defendant:
Ruth Sanchez Casler, Randall Kenneth Casler and Jason Thomas Casler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association v. Torres et al
as 5:2021cv00056
Defendant:
Raymundo Trevino Fonseca, Kathryn Nicole Polendo, Elizabeth Trevino Torres and others
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association fka Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association) as Trustee for Option One Mortgage Loa and Wells Fargo Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Moore, et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 20-35877
Appellee:
HOWARD M.S. HU, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, MARTIN SMITH and others
Appellant:
ROBERT GAVIN MOORE and TERESA JEAN MOORE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00978
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monique Tate, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, et al
as 19-13885
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS G. FIORILLA, Of Burr & Forman, LLP, WILLIAM FEARS, Butts County Superior Court, GARY LONG, Butts County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONIQUE Y. TATE, Officially known as Sahani Ugidahli or Principal Chieftess Blue Feather, LAMAR PERRYMAN, Officially known as Cate Honvnwv or Principal Chief Red Man, individually and in our official capacities, and with the members and citizens of the Coosa Nation Of North America (USA) and COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Coosa Nation of North America (USA) et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, Minnesota National Association et al
as 1:2019cv00685
Defendant:
Other Unnamed/Unknown Deputy Sheriffs, Phelan Hallinan Diamond and Jones, PLLC, Sheriff Gary Long and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Monique Y. Tate, Coosa Nation of North America (USA) and Lamar Perryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA v. WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al.
as 5:2018cv00467
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA, DR MONIQUE Y TATE, MICHAEL F TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jewitt-Gleaton et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv02003
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Jewitt-Gleaton and Calvin Gleaton
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. , McCalla Raymer LLC , Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CARTER et al
as 5:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
PAMELA A CARTER, JOHN Q ROBERTS and JOHN SHREWSBERRY
Counter_defendant:
John Stumpf, WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and JOHN SHREWSBERRY
Counter_claimant:
JOHN Q ROBERTS and PAMELA A CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
