Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00392
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ates et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01743
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James L Ates, Ronald Abrantes, Kendra Tennille Abron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv40709
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WENDELL ANDREW WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WENDELL v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77492
Plaintiff:
WENDELL ANDREWS and WENDELL ANDREWS
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Lindsey et al v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit et al
as 3:2008cv01096
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
Dallas Area Rapid Transit and United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Boyd et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd, Robin Taylor and Wendell Andrews
Defendant:
The United States of America, Michael B. Mukasey, Preston Pete Green and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lindsey et al v. ATU International et al
as 3:2008cv00232
Plaintiff:
James Lindsey, Gloria Abdelaziz, Kimberly Addison and others
Defendant:
ATU International, ATU International, Amalgamated Transit Union Local Division 1635 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
