Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Menes Ankh El v. State of Indiana, et al
as 23-2722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, now known as MENES ANKH EL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Menes Ankh El v. State of Indiana, et al
as 23-2660
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, now known as MENES ANKH EL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF INDIANA, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Lopez v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Saul A. Leon Lopez
Defendant:
Wendell Brown, Gretchen Brown and Neftali M. Villarreal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MENES ANKH EL also known as WENDELL BROWN v. INDIANA STATE et al
as 1:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL also known as WENDELL BROWN and WENDELL BROWN
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE, STATE OF INDIANA, COUNTY OF MARION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 6:2021cv00394
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Floyd Wendell Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Saul
as 6:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Floyd Wendell Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brown v. Scarantino
as 5:2020hc02165
Petitioner:
James Wendell Brown
Respondent:
Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. James Brown
as 20-3035
Defendant / Appellant:
James Wendell Brown, also known as Jimmy
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Wendell Brown v. Mark Sevier
as 20-1533
Petitioner / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, now known as MENES ANKH EL
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent
Wendell Brown v. Marion County Superior Court, et al
as 19-2799
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SMITH, in official and private capacities, MARION COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, MAJOR DAVIS, in official and private capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDELL BROWN, also known as Menes Ankh El
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
