Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Dupont v. Truong
as 2:2024cv02775
Defendant:
Tyrin Z. Truong
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams Dupont
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Richmond II v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00423
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Tina Wood, Kayla Albritton and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Richmond II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Sanders v. Crow et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00519
Defendant:
John Crow, Pamela Harris, Wendy Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Keshon Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boddy v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv01100
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Wendy Williams, John Q. Hamm and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Boddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
April Clark v. Wendy Williams, et al
as 24-3681
Defendant:
WENDY WILLIAMS and SOUTHEAST MENTAL HEALTH
Plaintiff:
APRIL CLARK
Sadora v. Fielding Graduate University et al

as 2:2024cv01240
Defendant:
Connie Veazey, Wendi Williams, Danielle Moreggi and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Sadora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Williams v. The City of Mobile, Alabama et al

as 1:2024cv00196
Defendant:
The City of Mobile, Alabama, Chief of Police and Mobile Police Department
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
April Clark v. Wendy Williams, et al
as 24-3525
Defendant:
SOUTHEAST MENTAL HEALTH and WENDY WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
APRIL CLARK
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Defendant:
John Hamm, Phyllis Morgan, Michael Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.