Cases 1 - 6 of 6
In re: Christine Scott
as 23-13411
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTINE SCOTT
Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, JIMMY PATRONIS and others
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, VOTERS OF TOMORROW ACTION, INC. and others
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, ASHLEY MOODY, KIM BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richards v. Sartory
as 9:2022cv80056
Plaintiff:
Neville D. Richards
Defendant:
Wendy Sartory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. LEE
as 4:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant:
LAUREL M. LEE, LAUREL M LEE, KIM A BARTON and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIELSEN et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 4:2020cv00236
Defendant:
GLENDA B. WILLIAMS, ASHLEY MOODY, SHARON CHASON and others
Plaintiff:
MORGAN OUTLAW, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS, RAY DAVIS and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CELCIO EDUARDO ROMERO, PAULINA HERNANDEZ MORALES, BIANCA MARIA BAEZ and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF FLORIDA, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NAITONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor:
CARL F MCCOY, JAMES K KRACHT, DOUGLAS E HALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
