Cases 1 - 10 of 128
Coal River Mountain Watch et al v. Putnam et al
as 3:2025cv00103
Plaintiff:
Coal River Mountain Watch, Appalachian Voices, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and others
Defendant:
Colonel Jayson Putnam, William H. Graham, Jr. and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy et al v. South Fork Coal Company, LLC
as 5:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and Appalachian Voices
Defendant:
South Fork Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy et al v. South Fork Coal Company, LLC
as 5:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and Appalachian Voices
Defendant:
South Fork Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Sierra Club v. West Virginia Coal Association
as 24-1854
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. REGAN, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, ADAM ORTIZ, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region III and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Regional Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region III
Plaintiff:
WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY, INC., WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION, INC. and SIERRA CLUB
Movant:
WEST VIRGINIA COAL ASSOCIATION
Intervenor:
WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Petitioner:
ROGER GLEN HANSHAW and CRAIG BLAIR
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Greenbrier River Watershed Association, Kanawha Forest Coalition and others
Defendant:
Jason Hattersley, United States Forest Service and Randy Moore
Intervenor:
South Fork Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Sierra Club et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, West Virginia Highlands Conservancy, Inc. and West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Michael S. Regan and Adam Ortiz
Intervenor:
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and West Virginia Coal Association
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE et al
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, GREENBRIER RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION, APPALACHIAN VOICES and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, RANDY MOORE and JASON HATTERSLEY
Intervenor:
SOUTH FORK COAL COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. ERP Environmental Fund, Inc
as 23-1696
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA HIGHLANDS CONSERVANCY and SIERRA CLUB
Appellee:
APPALACHIAN HEADWATERS, INC, Nonparty in whose favor an order has been entered
Defendant / Appellant:
ERP ENVIRONMENTAL FUND, INC and RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE OF ERP ENVIRONMENTAL FUND, INC.
Appellant:
VCLF LAND TRUST, INC, Nonparty against whom an order may be enforced
Receiver:
DOSS SPECIAL RECEIVER, LLC
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Highlands Conservancy
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Randy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Appalachian Voices v. United States Department of the Interior
as 23-1384
Petitioner:
APPALACHIAN VOICES, WILD VIRGINIA, WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior and others
Intervenor:
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
