Cases 11 - 20 of 540
Steven Brown v. ATF
as 23-2275
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEVEN ROBERT BROWN, BENJAMIN WEEKLEY and WEST VIRGINIA CITIZENS DEFENSE LEAGUE, INCORPORATED
Defendant / Appellant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, in official capacity and STEVEN MICHAEL DETTELBACH, Director of the ATF, in official capacity
Amicus Curiae:
GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE and EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY
GenBioPro, Inc. v. Kristina Raynes
as 23-2194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENBIOPRO, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KRISTINA D. RAYNES, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Putnam County and PATRICK MORRISEY, in his official capacity as Attorney General of West Virginia
Defendant:
MARK ALLEN SORSAIA, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Putnam County
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jones v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Jones
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bryant Young v. West Virginia University
as 23-2018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYANT KEITH YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY, WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS and DR. KATHLEEN O'HEARN RYAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Mara Forloine v. Aetna Better Health of West Virginia
as 23-1900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARA FORLOINE
Defendant / Appellant:
AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF WEST VIRGINIA
Defendant:
SHERRI A. YOUNG, D.O., MBA, FAAFP, Interim Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health, in her official capacity only, CYNTHIA BEANE, Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau for Medical Services, in her official capacity only, and and CYNTHIA BEANE, Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau for Medical Services, in her official capacity only
Mara Forloine v. Sherri Young
as 23-1899
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARA FORLOINE
Defendant / Appellant:
SHERRI A. YOUNG, D.O., MBA, FAAFP, Interim Cabinet Secretary of the West Virginia Department of Health, in her official capacity only, CYNTHIA BEANE, Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau for Medical Services, in her official capacity only, and and CYNTHIA BEANE, Deputy Commissioner of the Bureau for Medical Services, in her official capacity only
Defendant:
AETNA BETTER HEALTH OF WEST VIRGINIA
Stephen Hood v. Christina Farmer
as 23-1892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN HOOD, individually and on behalf of his minor daughter and minor son, MARY HOOD, individually and on behalf of her minor daughter and minor son, J.H., minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINA FARMER, individually as a member of West Virginia Child Protective Services and JANELLE FRAME, individually as a member of West Virginia Child Protective Services
Defendant:
THE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, WILLIAM E. BELCHER, individually as a member of WV DHHR and NECCO, LLC
West Virginia Parents for Religious Freedom v. Matthew Christiansen
as 23-1887
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WEST VIRGINIA PARENTS FOR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, PASTOR CHRIS FIGARETTI and JUDD UHL, individually and on behalf of their minor children, and on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WALDRON
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. MATTHEW CHRISTIANSEN, in his official capacities as the State Health Officer and Commissioner of the Bureau of Public Health
Defendant:
BELINDA MOSS, in her official capacity as the Principal Administrator of Cheat Lake Elementary School and MINDY WILSON, in her official capacity as the Principal Administrator of the Jefferson Elementary Center
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
