Cases
Smith et al v. West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2023cv00746
Defendant: William K. Marshall III, West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Billy and others
Plaintiff: Lonnie W. Smith, Jr. and Wanda Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00366
Plaintiff: Michael P. Jones
Defendant: West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Western Regional Jail, M. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedrick v. Jividen et al
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff: Tanner Hedrick
Defendant: Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Department of Correction an Rehabilitation, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Staats v. West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff: Jason Blaine Staats
Defendant: West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations and North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rauch v. Keefe Commissary Network et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00501
Plaintiff: Jordan L. Rauch
Defendant: John Frame, Betsy C. Jividen, Keefe Commissary Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Northern Regional Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00181
Defendant: Northern Regional Jail and West Virginia Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff: Jeremy Wayne Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00124
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?