Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mattox v. Western Mental Health Institute

as 2:2021cv02016
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Mattox, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Michael Mattox v. Western Mental Health Inst
as 19-5452
Defendant / Appellee:
WESTERN MENTAL HEALTH INSTITUTE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MATTOX
Mattox v. Western Mental Health Institute
as 2:2019cv02009
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynn v. Western Mental Health Institute

as 1:2016cv01141
Plaintiff:
James J. Wynn
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jefferson v. Ferrer, Poirot, and Wansbrough et al

as 3:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jefferson
Defendant:
Ferrer, Poirot, and Wansbrough, Eli Lilly Corporation and Garretson Law Firm, LLC
Consolidated Defendant:
Mat Daniel, Middle Tennessee Mental Health Institute, State of Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Western Mental Health Institute et al

as 1:2015cv01102
Plaintiff:
Leonard Quinn
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute, Randy Doles and Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Swift v. Western Mental Health Institute et al
as 1:2014cv01195
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Swift
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute, Haywood County Justice Complex, D. Nathaniel Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Western Mental Health Institute et al

as 1:2014cv01027
Plaintiff:
Leonard Quinn
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute and Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Western Mental Health Institute

as 1:2014cv01018
Plaintiff:
Leonard Quinn
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.