Other Statutes Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority v. US Dept. of Interior, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00712
Plaintiff: Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior , Kenneth Lee Salazar , United States Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor_defendant: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Firebaugh Canal Co, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1988cv00634
Plaintiff: Firebaugh Canal Water District and Central California Irrigation District
Defendant: USA , Department of Interior , Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor: Natural Resources Defense Council , Contra Costa County , Contra Costa Water Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
San Luis & Delta, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1997cv06140
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority , Bay Institute of San Francisco , Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associations and others
Defendant: USA , Department of Interior , Bureau of Reclamation and others
Intervenor_plaintiff: Pixley Irrigation District , Lower Tule River Irrigation District , Tri-Valley Water District and others
Amicu: California Department of Water Resources and - State Water Contractors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Reports
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al
as 1:2009at00461
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, Westlands Water District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01053
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant: Gary F. Locke, United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009at00462
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant: Gary F. Locke, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
Central Delta Water Agency et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00861
Plaintiff: Central Delta Water Agency, Central Delta Water Agency, South Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Rowan Gould, Ken McDermond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Type: Other Statutes None
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Salazar et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00407
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant: Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2009at00172
Plaintiff: San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant: Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?