Cases 51 - 55 of 55
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009cv01053
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant:
Gary F. Locke, United States Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Locke et al
as 1:2009at00462
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and others
Defendant:
Gary F. Locke, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Central Delta Water Agency et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2009cv00861
Plaintiff:
Central Delta Water Agency, Central Delta Water Agency, South Delta Water Agency and others
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Rowan Gould, Ken McDermond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, Westlands Water District and others
Defendant:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority et al v. Salazar et al
as 1:2009at00172
Plaintiff:
San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Westlands Water District
Defendant:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, United States Department of the Interior, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
