Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Director, Richmond County Board of Elections, et al
as 24-10078
Plaintiff:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMMISSION
USA v. Wilhy Harpo-Brown
as 22-10613
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 21-13177
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Official and Individual Capacities, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, Official and Individual Capacities, BO STOREY, Official and Individual Capacities and others
Aiken v. Harpo
as 1:2020cv00535
Defendant:
Wilhy Harpo
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aiken v. Harpo
as 1:2019cv04545
Defendant:
Wilhy Harpo
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Aiken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harpo-Brown v. Fulton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2019cv03848
Defendant:
Robert McBurney, McMickle, Kurey & Branch, LLP, Che Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo-Brown v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2019cv01220
Defendant:
John Doe, Atlanta Police Department, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo et al v. The Connor Group, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01130
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo and Davioun Collier
Defendant:
Fulton County Magistrate Court Clerk, The Connor Group, LLC, Magistrate Court of Fulton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harpo v. Fulton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2018cv01824
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
Fulton County Superior Court and Robert McBurney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Harpo v. McDonald's - Grady Hospital et al

as 1:2017cv03324
Plaintiff:
Wilhy Harpo
Defendant:
McDonald's - Grady Hospital and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.