Cases 1 - 10 of 599
Fair v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
Mywan D. Fair
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00458
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles C Marshall, George P Keary, Mark Kellianen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lomax v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Dialo Lomax
Defendant:
Sheriff Melody Maddox and DeKalb County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MADDOX v. MIMS et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL LAMAR MADDOX
Defendant:
CHARLES MIMS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Bernard et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Gina Bernard and Rachel Ness-Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Sayles v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01046
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Sayles
Defendant:
Chief Sheriff Melody Maddox, Larandy Akies and Dr. Barten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sayles v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv00966
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sayles
Defendant:
Chief Sheriff Melody Maddox, Larandy Alcies and Lt Etheridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
Jimmy David Mills
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
