Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Neal v. UMB Bank, National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Cerissa R. Neal
Defendant:
UMB Bank, National Association, Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper, Fay Servicing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neal, Jr. v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2018cv00590
Plaintiff:
Melvin Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Victor P. Mason, Hinds County, Mississippi and Detention Officers John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 3:2016cv00541
Plaintiff:
William F. Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. , Kenneth Charles Knight and Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
as 3:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. , Kenneth Charles Knight and Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knight et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
as 3:2013cv00321
Plaintiff:
Kenny Knight , Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr. and Michelle Lai
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal et al v. Huey Stockstill, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01259
Plaintiff:
Wayne P. Neal, Jr. and Laurie Bischoff Neal
Defendant:
Huey Stockstill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2006cv00616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
