Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Aaron Broussard v. Thomas Hollenhorst, et al
as 25-1509
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rhy Broussard
Defendant:
Thomas More Hollenhorst, Charles John Kovats, Jr., Melinda Williams and others
Davis, Jr. v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2025cv00111
Plaintiff:
William Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
(PS) Davis v. Davis
as 2:2025cv00555
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Elain Davis
Defendant:
Shaun William Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2025cv00047
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
ROBERT B MCCALLUM, JR, BRIAN KRAMER, GLEN BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIM v. UNLIMITED SETTLEMENT SERVICES et al
as 2:2025cv00505
Plaintiff:
SUNGSUK KIM
Defendant:
UNLIMITED SETTLEMENT SERVICES, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(PC) Bonilla v. Masanaga et al
as 2:2024cv03784
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
William Davis and Laura Masanaga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIM v. CIALINO et al
as 2:2024cv06861
Defendant:
UNLIMITED SETTLEMENT SERVICES, CATHERINE HARRINGTON, CHRISTOPHER POLECK and others
Plaintiff:
SUNGSUK KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
(PC)Bonilla v. Masunaga et al
as 2:2024cv03573
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Lure J. Masunaga and William Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Conner
as 5:2024cv05257
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Davis
Defendant:
Judge Jeff Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIM v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE et al
as 2:2024cv06560
Plaintiff:
SUNGSUK KIM
Defendant:
IRWIN STEIN, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, CATHERINE HARRINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
