Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Southern v. Krooss et al
as 3:2025cv00452
Plaintiff:
Willie B. Southern, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. William Frederick Krooss, Dr. Aja Awa Abai, Dr. Jacob N. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Michael Sigmon v. William Hughes, Sr.
as 25-1577
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY SIGMON
Defendant:
WILLIAM FREDERICK HUGHES, SR.
Douglas v. Cain
as 25-60191
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Adewale Idowe, Unknown Greene, K-9 Officer and others
(PC) Goldsberry v. North Bay Regional Hospital
as 2:2025cv00379
Defendant:
North Bay Regional Hospital
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Goldsberry, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Funk v. Bravo Residential Funding Trust 2022-RPL1
as 4:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Funk
Defendant:
Bravo Residential Funding Trust 2022-RPL1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
William Frederick Durst et al v. Universal Music Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv08630
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Universal Music Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Limp Bizkit, William Frederick Durst and Flawless Records, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Sigmon v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Sigmon
Defendant:
William Frederick Hughes, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv03130
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Douglas v. Cain et al
as 3:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Jasmine Magee, Kelley Christopher and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
