Cases 1 - 10 of 707
Smith v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2024cv01326
Respondent:
CO Pach, William Pollard, Kijek Jordan and others
Petitioner:
Cornell Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Pollard v. St. Andre
as 2:2024cv01747
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Petitioner:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pollard v. St. Andre
as 2:2024at00771
Petitioner:
Mr. William Pollard
Respondent:
Warden Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POLLARD et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2023cv04049
Plaintiff:
JOHN WILLIAM POLLARD and PATRICE POLLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pollard v. St. Andre
as 1:2023at00045
Petitioner:
William Pollard
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Pollard v. St. Andre
as 2:2023cv00113
Petitioner:
William Pollard
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Pollard et al
as 1:2022cv01451
Plaintiff:
Brandyn M Stevens
Defendant:
William Pollard, John Kind, Jay VanLanen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judge vs Pollard et al
as 2:2022cv01319
Plaintiff:
Brandon Scott Judge
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, William Pollard and Emily Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark v. McDermott et al
as 2:2022cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jonathon M Mark
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, William Pollard, Capt Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Juno
as 1:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Mike Donovan, William Pollard and Sandra L Juno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
