Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Proctor et al v. Santerelli et al
as 1:2021cv06634
Plaintiff:
William H. Proctor, Jemuel H. Westbrooks, Ceandre Moore and others
Defendant:
Warden D. Santerelli, Chief Perillo, Chief Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Proctor
as 21-2457
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. PROCTOR
PROCTOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv35485
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MAURICE PROCTOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Proctor v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv03174
Petitioner:
William L Proctor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Proctor v. Prince George's County, MD et al
as 8:2015cv03281
Plaintiff:
William Percy Proctor
Defendant:
Prince George's County, MD , Officer Wormuth, Officer Winegardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Proctor v. Guttierrez
as 3:2013cv03139
Petitioner:
William L Proctor
Respondent:
R Philip Guttierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William L Proctor v. R Philip Guttierrez
as 2:2012cv04774
Respondent:
R Philip Guttierrez
Petitioner:
William L Proctor
WILLIAMS v. SCHRADER
as 4:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
ERIC SEYMOUR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REBECCA LOUISE SCHRADER, CRYSTAL FRAZE, WILLIAM A PROCTOR, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLTHOUSER et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2009cv79807
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAYMOND PROCTOR HOLTHOUSER and JOANN HOLTHOUSER
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., GAF CORP., KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Proctor v. Wong, et al
as 2:1996cv01401
Petitioner:
William A Proctor
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of California and Robert Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
