Cases 1 - 10 of 26
(PC) Clifton v. Curry et al
as 2:2020cv02149
Defendant:
M. Curry, Reyes, Flam and others
Plaintiff:
William Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28171
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLIFTON GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Sanks et al
as 4:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Roland Jones, Keith Sade, Jason Ellis and others
Defendant:
Jose Morales, Nathan Brooks, Robin Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolar et al v. Southern Intermodal Xpress, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bolar , William Clifton , Bryan Freeman and others
Defendant:
Southern Intermodal Xpress, LLC, Lazer Spot, Inc. and Lazer Spot Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clifton v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv04146
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Marcus William Clifton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
TILLMAN v. CLIFTON et al
as 2:2016cv04707
Plaintiff:
JERJUAN DAYMAR TILLMAN
Defendant:
WILLIAM CLIFTON, JOESPH MURPHY and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Clifton v. Xavier Cano et al
as 2:2016cv04039
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Xavier Cano, M. Crenshaw, M. Crenshaw and others
Plaintiff:
William Clifton
Balal Services Trust v. William Stacey, Sr.
as 15-2135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BALAL SERVICES TRUST
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLIFTON STACEY, SR.
Defendant:
FREIDA B. STACEY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Geigus v. Hayes, et al
as 15-1415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLORIA J. GEIGUS
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL HAYES, individually and in official capacity Newport Police Department, RI, GIRARD GALVIN, individually and in official capacity, City of Newport, RI and WILLIAM CLIFTON, individually and in official capacity as Justice of the District Court of Newport County, RI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
