Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Crowley v. Bryce's Lawn Service et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
William Crowley
Defendant:
Bryce's Lawn Service, Bryce Satterfield and Bryce's Lawn Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CROWLEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv08774
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CROWLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrews et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11486
Plaintiff:
Thomas Black, John Mastrogianni, Alecia Huie and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Addesso et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2016cv09937
Plaintiff:
Caron Addesso , Jorge Alban , Sandy Alberto and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saudi Binladin Group, Mohamed Binladin Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crowley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv15561
Plaintiff:
Monique Crowley and William Crowley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schofield v. Judge Linda Schoonover et al
as 8:2013cv02042
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
Judge Linda Schoonover, Judge Frederick Schott, Judge John L. Woodward, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schofield v. Judge Linda Schoonover et al
as 6:2013cv01253
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
Judge Linda Schoonover, Judge Frederick Schott, Judge John L. Woodward, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Jamnik et al
as 1:2012cv01779
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Alan Jamnik , Ramy Jamnik , 478 Essentials Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROWLEY v. AVILES et al
as 2:2011cv02995
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CROWLEY
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and COUNTY OF HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
