Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
William D Jones
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wang v. Vounatsos et al
as 1:2022cv11180
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Michel Vounatsos, STELIOS PAPADOPOULOS, Alexander J Denner and others
Ivey McCray v. William Jones, et al
as 21-3294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVEY MCCRAY
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM D. JONES, CARLA TENTION, Essex County Child Support Enforcment Division and RASHAD SHABAZZ-BURNS, Director Essex County Child Support Enforcement Division
MCCRAY v. JONES et al
as 2:2021cv03937
Plaintiff:
IVEY MCCRAY
Defendant:
CARLA TENTION, JOHN DOE 1-50, RASHAD SHABAZZ-BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc. v. Loving et al
as 2:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Wendell Loving and William D. Jones
Plaintiff:
Safeway Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jones v. Union Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv02072
Plaintiff:
William D. Jones
Defendant:
Union Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv01299
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. JONES
Unknown:
Blair Bertram Matyszczyk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv04424
Plaintiff:
William D Jones
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fischman v. Reed et al
as 3:2016cv01006
Plaintiff:
Arthur Fischman
Defendant:
Debra L. Reed, Joseph A. Householder, Steven D. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Shupak v. Debra L. Reed et al
as 2:2016cv01723
Defendant:
Dennis V. Arriola, Justin C. Bird, Alan L. Boeckmann and others
Plaintiff:
David Shupak
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
