Cases 1 - 8 of 8
William Miller, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 20-16099
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM EARL MILLER, Jr.
Miller #116524 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv03176
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
William Earl Miller, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ricky Ashley v. Doc Holladay, et al
as 13-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ricky Ashley
Plaintiff:
Clevelen Bosley, Reginald Smith, Michael D. Davis and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Doc Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Randy Morgan, Chief, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Shawn Smith, Intake Commander, Pulaski County Detention Facility and others
Miller v. Aguillar et al
as 2:2012cv02321
Plaintiff:
William Earl Miller
Defendant:
David Aguillar and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ashley et al v. Holladay et al
as 4:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley, Clevelen Bosley, Reginald Smith and others
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Shawn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frances Miller/Perry v. Mark Culliom, et al
as 10-1273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frances Renee Miller/Perry
Plaintiff:
William Earl Miller
Defendant - Appellee:
Mark Culliom, Lt., McPherson Unit, ADC, John Maples, Warden, McPherson Unit, ADC, Larry May, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Miller/Perry et al v. Culliom et al
as 1:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Frances Renee Miller/Perry and William Earl Miller
Defendant:
Mark Culliom, John Maples, Larry May and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Norris et al
as 2:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Earl Miller
Defendant:
Larry Norris, Betty Lieblong, Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
