Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Derrick Brown v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 11-2751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, SHELBY COUNTY GOVERNMENT, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Brown v. Kustoff et al
as 3:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
David Kustoff, Edward L Stanton, III, State of Tennessee and others
Amicu:
Shelby Count Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Shelby County Government, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIBBONS et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65279
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GIBBONS and SHIRLEY J GIBBONS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Tennessee et al v. Samuels
as 2:2011cv02435
Defendant:
Arthur Blair Samuels
Miscellaneou:
Otis Jackson
Plaintiff:
State of Tennessee, C. Teeters, William Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bledsoe v. Gibbons et al
as 2:2011cv02218
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Bledsoe
Defendant:
William Gibbons, Chris Craft and W.A. Sweet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The State of Tennessee v. Gaines
as 2:2011cv02139
Plaintiff:
The State of Tennessee and William Gibbons
Defendant:
Eddie Gaines
Miscellaneou:
Otis Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. Gibbons et al
as 2:2011cv02088
Plaintiff:
Bruce Turner
Defendant:
William Gibbons, Carolyn Blackett and W.H. Sweet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricky Benson v. TN, et al
as 10-5963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY BENSON, aka Rickey Benson
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, A. C. WHARTON, Mayor, G. BURTON, Detective and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
