Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Robins v. Fairman et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Damien Robins
Respondent:
Gary Fairman, Steve L. Dobrescy, Michael Bondgard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pough v. Gittere
as 3:2023cv00425
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jermaine Campbell, Sr. v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-15972
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE JAMAICA CAMPBELL, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Weslie Martin v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 23-15741
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLIE MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM GITTERE, Substituted for William Ruebart per #44 Order
Hayes v. Gitter
as 2:2023cv00463
Petitioner:
Daveon Kyree Hayes
Respondent:
William Gitter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKnight v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Adrian McKnight
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forsberg Todd v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-16657
Petitioner / Appellant:
FORSBERG TODD
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Rafael Reid v. William Gittere, et al
as 22-15947
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL REID
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE, CHARLES DANIELS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.