Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Golden et al v. Deco Power Lift, Inc.
as 8:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
William Golden and Golden Manufacturing, Inc.
Defendant:
Deco Power Lift, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Golden et al v. Neptune Boat Lifts, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv60935
Defendant:
James E. Harrison, Randall Whitesides and Neptune Boat Lifts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Golden Manufacturing, Inc. and William Golden
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
GOLDEN III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20258
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GOLDEN III and WILLIAM GOLDEN, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Lobur et al
as 1:2021cv10290
Defendant:
Meredith Lobur, William Golden, Town Manager of the Township of Provincetown and others
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Barnett et al
as 4:2020cv04066
Defendant:
Jess Boysen, Heather Bowers, John Shyne and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Edgar Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Does v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv00092
Defendant:
Elizabeth Pitman, Arkansas Department of Human Services, Paula Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golden et al v. Faro Boat Lifts, Inc.
as 1:2020cv20889
Plaintiff:
Golden Manufacturing, Inc. and William Golden
Defendant:
Faro Boat Lifts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Jackson v. Murphy et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Keith Jackson
Defendant:
Patrick Murphy, Gary Hamblin, Edward Wall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Naslanic v. Golden et al
as 3:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Robert S Naslanic
Defendant:
William Golden, David Mitchell, Jason Gula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DJANGMAH v. WOOLWICH et al
as 1:2014cv06011
Plaintiff:
VICTOR T. DJANGMAH
Defendant:
WILLIAM GOLDEN' WOOLWICH, JOINT MUNICIPAL COURT, RAY SKRADZINISKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
