Cases 1 - 10 of 30
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, GEORGE PIRRONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. PRO CUSTOM SOLAR, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Pro Custom Solar, LLC d/b/a Momentum Solar, LLC, Arthur Souritzidis, Cameron Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Preston et al
as 4:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Vernon Preston, Correct Care Solutions, Richard Ellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. MERCK & CO, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01557
Defendant:
MERCK & CO, INC and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WERFEL CHIROPRACTIC, PC CHIROPRACTIC, PC et al v. NUTRIMOST, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
HOWARD WERFEL and WERFEL CHIROPRACTIC, PC
Defendant:
NUTRIMOST LLC , NUTRIMOST DOCTORS, LLC , RAYMOND WISNIEWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
JOHNSON v. LINK et al
as 2:2017cv02624
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
CYNTHIA LINK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. USA
as 2:2016cv01196
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02134
Petitioner:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. WARDEN, FCI HAZELTON
as 3:2015cv00258
Petitioner:
BERT WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI HAZELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., INC. v. LANDIS et al
as 5:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
STATE NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., INC.
Defendant:
DALE LANDIS , JOHN LANDIS , DUSTON LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
