Cases
In Re: Ja Qure Al-Bukhari
as 19-894
Respondent: Guimond, Lieutanant, Sandone, Correctional Officer, Jeremie St. Pierre and others
Petitioner: Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
Al-Bukhari v. Corrections
as 19-577
Defendant: John Doe, 3, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Barbara Savoie, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Henry Falcone and others
Defendant / Appellee: Ellen Durko, All sued in their individual and official capacities, Jeremie St. Pierre, All sued in their individual and official capacities, William Faneuff, All sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
Riddick v. Semple
as 19-565
Defendant / Appellee: John Aldi, Counselor Supervisor, Individual and Official Capacity, David Maiga, Director of Offender Classification and Population Management, Individual and Official Capacity, Nicole Prior, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Lieutenant, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jerome Riddick
Quint v. Semple
as 17-3275
Plaintiff - Appellant: Richard R. Quint
Defendant - Appellee: Scott Semple, Commisioner, Individual and Official Capacities, William Mulligan, Warden, Individual and Official Capacities, Gerald Hines, Deputy Warden, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Al-Bukhari v. Department of Correction
as 17-2292
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ja Qure Al-Bukhari, FKA Jerome Riddick
Defendant - Appellee: Scott Semple, Commissioner, all sued in their individual and official capacities, Anne Cournoyer, Individual and Official Capacities, William Mulligan, Warden, Individual and Official Capacities and others
Defendant: Department of Corrections, All sued in their individual and official capacities, John Doe, 1, 2, and 3, all sued in their individual and official capacities, Scott Erfe and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?