Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Neville v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
William Neville
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and E&C's Snacks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Neville v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00472
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
William Neville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
O'NEAL v. NEVILL et al
as 2:2017cv00021
Defendant:
WILLIAM NEVILL, JAMES SWITZER and ROBERT VAN BUREN
Plaintiff:
RICKEY O'NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neville v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv17527
Plaintiff:
William Neville and James E. Neville
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nevilles v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02955
Movant:
William Nevilles
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Accede v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06222
Plaintiff:
Moses J Accede
Defendant:
P.O. Junior Celestin, City of New York, Sergeant Ariana Esteban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: William Nevilles
as 16-6001
Movant:
In re: WILLIAM NEVILLES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv05230
Defendant:
P.O. Junior Celestin, City of New York, P.O. William Neville and others
Plaintiff:
David Jones and Proctor F. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Nevilles v. USA
as 15-5646
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM NEVILLES
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lubin, SARL v. Lubin North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02696
Plaintiff:
Lubin, SARL
Defendant:
Lubin North America, Inc., N.E.W. Brands, Inc., Rhinoceros East Cobb, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
