Cases 1 - 10 of 22
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20251
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-10254
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RAMOS et al v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv20716
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAMOS and MIGDALIA CONCEPCION
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-100 and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56087
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bond v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2020cv00780
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, Justin Marzec, Derek Jappe and others
Plaintiff:
Earl H Bond, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mejia et. al. v. Ideal Concrete Contracting, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2019cv04573
Plaintiff:
William Ramos, Miguel Zavala, Jorge Trigueros and others
Defendant:
Ideal Concrete Contracting, Inc. and Christopher A. Drees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11971
Plaintiff:
William Ramos
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc., Fresenius USA, Inc., Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slayden et al v. Schulz Boat Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bruce Slayden and Nora Slayden
Defendant:
Schulz Boat Company, Inc. and William Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfonso William Ramos II v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2014cv08050
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Alfonso William Ramos, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
