Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-4371
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GITTERE, STEVEN SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Vandecar v. Reubart, et al.
as 23-3622
Petitioner:
ROSEMARY VANDECAR
Respondent:
WILLIAM REUBART, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Gould v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Steven Eric Gould
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Warden William Gittere and William Reubart
Gustavo Hernandez v. USDC-NVR
as 22-70088
Not Classified By Court:
In re: GUSTAVO HERNANDEZ and WILLIAM REUBART
Petitioner:
GUSTAVO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Zane Floyd v. Charles Daniels, et al
as 21-16134
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ZANE M. FLOYD
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections;, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director of Operations, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Defendant:
ISHAN AZZAM, Chief Medical Officer
Not Classified By Court:
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL, INC.
Nathaniel Williams v. Darren Spiece, et al
as 21-15800
Defendant / Appellee:
SANCHEZ, JOSEPH LEWIS, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.