Cases 21 - 30 of 132
Harris et al v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
Anthony Harris, Tavete Letoi, Rafael Bonet and others
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Mr. James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Sherman v. Harold Wickham, et al
as 23-15665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONALD SHERMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
HAROLD WICKHAM, KIM THOMAS, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden and others
Vaca v. Reubart
as 3:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Juan Vaca
Defendant:
William Reubart, Curtis Rigney and Michael Stolks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Reubart
as 2:2023cv00616
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanchez
Defendant:
William Reubart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ammar Harris v. F. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15467
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
F. DREESEN, MORIN, CALVIN JOHNSON and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ammar Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al
as 23-15466
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, AARON FORD and others
Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ackerman v. Maskoff et al
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Steffen Maskoff, David Drummond, William Reubart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Drummond et al
as 3:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
David Drummond, William Reubart, K. Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gould v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Steven Eric Gould
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Warden William Gittere and William Reubart
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 23-15280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, terminated per #9 FAC, ELY STATE PRISON, terminated per #9 FAC, EXUM, Dr. terminated per #9 FAC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
