Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Ramsey v. N.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv01498
Defendant:
William Reubart, Lyn and N.D.O.C
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-4371
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GITTERE, STEVEN SISOLAK and others
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Petitioner:
Heather L. Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
David Drummond, William Reubart, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabalan v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cabalan
Defendant:
State of Nevada, James Dzurenda, Charles Daniels and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Wallen v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00586
Petitioner:
Heather Louise Wallen
Respondent:
William Reubart and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Moore v. Reubart et al
as 2:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Laketha Moore
Defendant:
William Reubart, Jennifer Nash, Gabrielle Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
