Cases 1 - 10 of 307
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2467
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden FMC Rochester, Collette Peters, F.B.O.P. Director and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2445
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden F.M.C. Rochester MN, Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G. and Collette Peters, Director F.B.O.P.
Davis v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00433
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv01675
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2315
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden FMC Rochester, Collette Peters, F.B.O.P. Director and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden F.M.C. Rochester MN, Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G. and Collette Peters, Director F.B.O.P.
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Colette S. Peters and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
