Cases 1 - 10 of 5,430
Demison v. Collier et al
as 9:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert Demison, III
Defendant:
Brain Collier, Lorie Davis, William Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lush, William v. McNamara, Nicholas
as 3:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
William Stephen Lush, II
Respondent:
Judge Nicholas J. McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitney v. Stephens et al
as 5:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Kaleb Whitney
Defendant:
William Stephens and Jackie Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Stephens
as 22-20406
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jerry Wilson, also known as Steve Vic Parker
Defendant / Appellee:
William Stephens, Brad Livingston, Joni White and others
Favela v. Collier
as 22-40415
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raul Gerardo Favela, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Bryan Collier, Individually, William Stephens, Individually, Brad Livingston, Individually and others
Crowder v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2022cv02267
Plaintiff:
Joe Crowder
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Lorie Davis, Warden Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Parker et al
as 4:2021cv01980
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Brad Livingston and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
Steve Vic Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCallister v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00239
Plaintiff:
David H. McCallister
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch Institution Division, Director's Medical and Dental Department, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crayton v. Director et al
as 6:2019cv00274
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Crayton and Big Ant
Defendant:
FNU Baker, Travis Turner, TDCJ Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Stephens et al
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
