Cases 81 - 90 of 5,576
Hardin v. Stephens
as 1:2017cv00615
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Kevin Todd Hardin
Respondent:
Director William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2017cv00345
Plaintiff:
Craig Mack
Defendant:
TDCJ-CID, UTMB, Internal Affairs Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Stephens
as 3:2017cv01497
Petitioner:
Michael Quincy White
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Olive v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-10580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, KIETH GENTRY, JOE MILBERN and others
Gregory Robinson v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-40523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ALLEN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DEBBIE RINEHART, GURNEY UNIT and others
Chavez v. Stephens et al
as 3:2016cv00127
Petitioner:
Carlos Heredia Chavez
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lakeith Amir-Sharif v. TDCJ, et al
as 17-40486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKEITH RAQIB AMIR-SHARIF
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, EZENWA O. NWAGBUSO, DELANA M. CHACHERE and others
Heslep v. Stephens
as 2:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
Williams Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erick Lawson v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-40387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERICK LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, Individually and in his/her official capacity and MADELINE ORTIZ, Individually and in his/her official capacity
Heslep v. Stephens et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mark Heslep
Defendant:
William Stephens, Shane Hembree, Alfreda Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
