Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Cowan v. Miller et al
as 2:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
William Stokes Cowan #229059, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Miller and Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GinA v. CITY OF AUGUSTA MAINE et al
as 1:2016cv00100
Plaintiff:
GinA
Defendant:
CITY OF AUGUSTA MAINE, WILLIAM STOKES, WILLIAM BRIDGEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
William Stokes, James Huffins and Carl Lee Ward
Defendant:
J R Smith, Michael Bachand and Mike Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as LAW/6:13-cv-01600
Plaintiff:
William Stokes
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C and others
Stokes v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2013cv01600
Plaintiff:
William Stokes
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Takeda Pharmaceuticals L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vivian Standberry et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv04787
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Sheryl McMorrow, Rebecca Perez, Lisa Stainbrook and others
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03765
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANAEME v. USA et al
as 1:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
CHIBUEZE C ANAEME
Defendant:
USA, DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL AND FINANCIAL REGULATION, OFFICE OF LICENSING AND REGULATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reclamation District 1001 v. Stokes
as 2:2010cv02374
Plaintiff:
Reclamation District 1001
Defendant:
William Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
