Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Collins v. Waller
as 2:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Reginald B. Collins
Defendant:
William Waller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
WALLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49488
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. William Waller
as 19-10367
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM WALLER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Waller v. Mann et al
as 2:2017cv01626
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Waller , JR
Defendant:
Ranjit S. Mann , Jane Doe Mann and Manney Transport LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2017cv05888
Plaintiff:
Thomas William Waller , JR
Defendant:
Ranjit S. Mann , Jane Doe Mann and Manney Transport LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill v. Bryant et al
as 3:2017cv00603
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Christopher B. Epps, Phillip Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Larson et al v. Federal Service Corporation Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00662
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larson , Jacquelynne Larson , Pacific Financial Association Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Bradley Rhodes, High Desert Trust, Patricia Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Waller et al
as 2:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
William Waller and Wells Fargo Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
Esau Grubbs v. Mississippi Supreme Court, et al
as 16-60024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ESAU ABSALOM GRUBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT and HONORABLE WILLIAM WALLER, Chief Justice
WALLER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2015cv01608
Defendant:
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS, COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
