Cases 1 - 5 of 5
MO Pub Svc Cmsn v. FERC
as 02-1132
Petitioner:
Missouri Public Service Commission
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Missouri Gas Energy, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc., Kansas Gas Service, a Division of ONEOK, Inc. and others
MO Pub Svc Cmsn v. FERC
as 99-1203
Petitioner:
Missouri Public Service Commission
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc.
Intervenor:
Kansas Pipeline Company, Missouri Gas Energy, a Division of Southern Union Company, Kansas Gas Service Company, a Division of ONEOK, Inc. and others
MO Pub Svc Cmsn v. FERC
as 99-1169
Petitioner:
Missouri Public Service Commission
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Kansas Corporation Commission
Intervenor:
Missouri Gas Energy, a Division of Southern Union Company, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Energy Trading Corporation and others
Inter Nat Gas Assn v. FERC
as 98-1333
Petitioner:
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Missouri Gas Energy, Division of Southern Union Company, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, Williams Gas Pipelines Central, Inc. and others
Terminated Party:
Essex County Gas Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, East Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership and others
:
Anadarko Petro Corp v. FERC
as 98-1227
Petitioner:
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Amoco Production Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, OXY USA Inc and others
Intervenor:
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, Kansas Gas Service Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
