Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
McDonald v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 1:2024cv08398
Plaintiff:
Kyle McDonald
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Jo-Ann Stores, LLC
as 5:2024cv02003
Defendant:
Jo-Ann Stores, LLC
Plaintiff:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. VZ Design Inc.
as 3:2024cv07992
Defendant:
VZ Design Inc.
Plaintiff:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Dimitri Kermani v. Williams-Sonoma Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv08994
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Kermani
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma Inc., Does 1-10 and Rejuvenation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anne Heiting v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv08098
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Anne Heiting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Spector v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 4:2024cv06617
Plaintiff:
Karen Spector
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. v. Carrot Cart, Inc. d/b/a Dupe.com
as 1:2024cv06597
Plaintiff:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Defendant:
Carrot Cart, Inc. doing business as Dupe.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a) False representation of goods sold in interstate commerce
Crypton LLC v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 2:2024cv12201
Plaintiff:
Crypton LLC
Defendant:
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Fu v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01745
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.
Plaintiff:
Norman Fu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
