Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 146
Annabel #414234 v. Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Robert Wayne Annabel #414234, II
Defendant: Heidi E. Washington, Jeremy Bush, Unknown McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard #252329 v. Dirschell et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: Lamont Heard #252329
Defendant: Adrian Dirschell, Jeremy Bush and Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deatrick v. Dalton et al
as 1:2023cv12942
Plaintiff: Alante Dajuan Deatrick
Defendant: Dalton, Davis, Willis Chapman and others
Smith v. Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv12903
Plaintiff: Jermaine Lewis Smith
Defendant: Heidi Washington, Willis Chapman, Kristopher Steece and others
Levitan v. Maclean et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv12439
Plaintiff: Randall Richard Levitan
Defendant: Maclean, Johnson, Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Chapman
as 4:2023cv12359
Petitioner: Martez Dion Mason
Respondent: Willis Chapman
Levitan #859804 v. Maclean et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00986
Plaintiff: Randall Levitan #859804
Defendant: Unknown Maclean, Unknown Johnson, Unknown Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Harris v. Willis Chapman
as 23-1806
Petitioner / Appellant: GREGORY FRANKLIN HARRIS
Respondent / Appellee: WILLIS CHAPMAN, Acting Warden, Macomb Correctional Facility
Robert PrescottIn re: Robert Prescott
as 23-1645
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT HEZEKIAH PRESCOTT
Respondent: WILLIS CHAPMAN, Acting Warden, Macomb Correctional Facility
Davis v. Chapman
as 2:2023cv11669
Petitioner: Marlon Eugene Davis
Respondent: Warden Willis Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?