Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HARRISON v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HARRISON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77506
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chism v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv00867
Defendant:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Willie Harrison Chism, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRISON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51611
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abulzahab et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12658
Plaintiff:
Alie Soufan, Roy Gendron, Derek Thomas and others
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Nelson Chai, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Harrison v. Martin et al
as 3:2018cv02205
Defendant:
Nurse Cummins, Nurse Chlebowski, B. Phillip Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 2:2016cv00604
Petitioner:
Willie Harrison
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harrison v. Nicholas et al
as 1:2013cv09226
Plaintiff:
Willie Harrison
Defendant:
Officer Nicholas and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan et al v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 6:2012cv00705
Plaintiff:
William A. Ryan , Joseph R. Saenz , Jack H. Faddis, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ryan et al v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 8:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
William A. Ryan , Joseph R. Saenz , Jack H. Faddis, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
