Cases 1 - 6 of 6
WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC et al v. RIVARD POPCORN PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 5:2013cv07438
Plaintiff:
WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC and WORLD GOURMET ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
RIVARD POPCORN PRODUCTS, INC. and ROBERT RIVARD
Counter_claimant:
RIVARD POPCORN PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
WORLD GOURMET ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC and WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC et al v. RIVARD POPCORN PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01117
Plaintiff:
WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC and WORLD GOURMET ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
RIVARD POPCORN PRODUCTS, INC. and ROBERT RIVARD
Counter_claimant:
RIVARD POPCORN PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter_defendant:
WORLD GOURMET ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC and WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RIVARD et al v. BELLO et al
as 5:2012cv04642
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RIVARD and DOGLEG PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant:
JERRY BELLO , JASON I. COHEN , WORLD GOURMET ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sensible Foods, LLC v. World Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv02819
Plaintiff:
Sensible Foods, LLC
Defendant:
World Gourmet, Inc. , Hain Celestial Group, Inc. , World Gourmet Marketing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Sensible Foods, LLC v. World Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv02819
Plaintiff:
Sensible Foods, LLC
Defendant:
World Gourmet, Inc. , Hain Celestial Group, Inc. , World Gourmet Marketing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
NEW WORLD HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. NONNI'S FOOD COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
NEW WORLD HOLDINGS, LLC, WORLD GOURMET MARKETING, LLC, JASON COHEN and others
Defendant:
NONNI'S FOOD COMPANY, INC., MAMMA SAYS ACQUISITION CO., MAMMA SAYS NY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
