Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Leonard et al v. Westcare Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00240
Defendant:
Wyoming Board of Parole Chair Person, Wyoming Attorney General Michael, Wyoming Attorney General Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Elmer Petersen, Deon A Leonard, Earl Dimas and others
Petitioner:
Michael L Hackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Lampert et al
as 2:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
JonMichael Guy
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Jeffie Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunderson v. Wyoming Department of Corrections Director et al
as 1:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alan Gunderson
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Prison Administrator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. WY Department of Corrections, et al
as 14-8033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT OWEN MARSHALL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC./CORIZON HEALTH, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, individually and inis official capacity and others
DeMillard v. Wyoming Department of Correction Medium Correctional Institution Therapist et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Eric Levanter DeMillard
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Correction Medium Correctional Institution Therapist, Richard Burton, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Psychiatrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glover v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Glover
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections, State of Wyoming, Wyoming Governor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
