Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Wang et al v. FTI Consulting LLP
as 5:2024cv09224
Defendant:
FTI Consulting LLP
Plaintiff:
Xin Wang and Kevin Lu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Wang v. Essence International Financial Holdings Limited
as 1:2024cv08376
Plaintiff:
Xin Wang
Defendant:
Essence International Financial Holdings Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Wang v. Essence International Financial Holdings Limited

as 1:2024cv08204
Defendant:
Essence International Financial Holdings Limited and SDIC Securities International Financial Holdings Limited
Plaintiff:
Xin Wang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Immigration: Naturalization Authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08972
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Immigration: Naturalization Authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James et al v. Wang et al
as 3:2024cv01920
Defendant:
Xin Wang and Jindi Arrival Inc
Plaintiff:
Eugene James and Sasha Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.